Hi!
What I originally intend to do is this:
Unzip an archive, which always contains two files named 'x.a' and 'y.b'. The file extensions 'a' and 'b' are always the same but 'x' and 'y' are different from archive to archive.
Initally, 'x.a' and 'y.b' will be provided by the field 'file' of two rows of the same stream.
This I want to transform into a single row with two fields named 'a' and 'b' - keeping the respective filename.
Clipboard05.jpg
Now I came up with a transformation that theoretically (at least) should achieve this - the idea is such:
Clipboard07.jpg
A part of the transformation doing this looks as follows:
Clipboard02.jpg
Now the problem simply is this - I get no result from the reg ex step (simple expression: ^(.*)$) if I apply it to 'pq' ...
Clipboard09.jpg
... but I get one when I apply it to any other field:
Clipboard11.jpg
1) I gave the details about my intention because I am very interested in simpler solutions - if you have one!
2) Is there a way to make this transformation workable?
Thanks in advance
Raffael
What I originally intend to do is this:
Unzip an archive, which always contains two files named 'x.a' and 'y.b'. The file extensions 'a' and 'b' are always the same but 'x' and 'y' are different from archive to archive.
Initally, 'x.a' and 'y.b' will be provided by the field 'file' of two rows of the same stream.
This I want to transform into a single row with two fields named 'a' and 'b' - keeping the respective filename.
Clipboard05.jpg
Now I came up with a transformation that theoretically (at least) should achieve this - the idea is such:
Clipboard07.jpg
A part of the transformation doing this looks as follows:
Clipboard02.jpg
Now the problem simply is this - I get no result from the reg ex step (simple expression: ^(.*)$) if I apply it to 'pq' ...
Clipboard09.jpg
... but I get one when I apply it to any other field:
Clipboard11.jpg
1) I gave the details about my intention because I am very interested in simpler solutions - if you have one!
2) Is there a way to make this transformation workable?
Thanks in advance
Raffael